Washington, UT vs Woods Cross, UT

Washington, UT and Woods Cross, UT have a very similar cost of living, with only a 3% difference in their overall index. Washington scores 124 while Woods Cross scores 120 on the cost of living index, where 100 represents the national average. The day-to-day expenses for residents in both cities are comparable, though differences emerge when looking at specific categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Washington is $1,581/month compared to $1,572/month in Woods Cross — a 1% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Woods Cross is more affordable at $472,600 median vs $511,100.

Median household income in Washington is $94,015 compared to $115,335 in Woods Cross (-18.5%). Woods Cross offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Washington spend roughly 20.2% of their income on rent, more than the 16.4% in Woods Cross.