Walkerville, MT vs Wilsall, MT

Walkerville is moderately more affordable than Wilsall, with a 10.5% lower cost of living index. Walkerville scores 77 compared to 86 for Wilsall, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Wilsall can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Walkerville is $1,065/month compared to $1,100/month in Wilsall — a 3% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Walkerville is more affordable at $147,200 median vs $214,500.

Median household income in Walkerville is $44,226 compared to $65,588 in Wilsall (-32.6%). While Wilsall is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Walkerville spend roughly 28.9% of their income on rent, more than the 20.1% in Wilsall.

Climate-wise, Wilsall is notably warmer with an average of 45.5°F compared to 40.1°F in Walkerville. Wilsall receives more rainfall at 14.5" per year compared to 12.8" in Walkerville.