Springfield, MN vs St. Paul Park, MN
The cost of living difference between Springfield, MN and St. Paul Park, MN is dramatic. Springfield is 44.9% cheaper than St. Paul Park, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Springfield has a cost index of 67 while St. Paul Park sits at 121, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.
On the housing front, median rent in Springfield is $781/month compared to $2,118/month in St. Paul Park — a 63% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Springfield is more affordable at $117,600 median vs $252,800.
Median household income in Springfield is $59,412 compared to $98,670 in St. Paul Park (-39.8%). The higher salaries in St. Paul Park partially offset the cost difference, but don't fully close the gap. Looking at affordability, residents of Springfield spend roughly 15.8% of their income on rent, less than the 25.8% in St. Paul Park.
Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (45.4°F vs 46.5°F). St. Paul Park receives more rainfall at 29.2" per year compared to 28" in Springfield.
Income & Cost
Housing
Salary Equivalency Calculator
What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?
Everyday Prices
BLS Average Prices by metro area
Climate
NOAA 30-year normals (1991-2020)