Scott, OH vs Timberlake, OH

The cost of living difference between Scott, OH and Timberlake, OH is dramatic. Scott is 30.6% cheaper than Timberlake, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Scott has a cost index of 58 while Timberlake sits at 84, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.

On the housing front, median rent in Scott is $681/month compared to $1,112/month in Timberlake — a 39% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Scott is more affordable at $67,500 median vs $216,300.

Median household income in Scott is $55,625 compared to $78,214 in Timberlake (-28.9%). The higher salaries in Timberlake partially offset the cost difference, but don't fully close the gap. Looking at affordability, residents of Scott spend roughly 14.7% of their income on rent, less than the 17.1% in Timberlake.