Scott AFB, IL vs Waterman, IL

The cost of living difference between Scott AFB, IL and Waterman, IL is dramatic. Waterman is 34.1% cheaper than Scott AFB, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Scott AFB has a cost index of 108 while Waterman sits at 81, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.

Renters will find that Scott AFB has a median rent of $1,640/month while Waterman comes in at $897/month, a 83% difference.

Median household income in Scott AFB is $91,115 compared to $97,386 in Waterman (-6.4%). Waterman offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Scott AFB spend roughly 21.6% of their income on rent, more than the 11.1% in Waterman.

Climate-wise, Scott AFB is notably warmer with an average of 57.7°F compared to 47.8°F in Waterman. Scott AFB receives more rainfall at 43.4" per year compared to 37.4" in Waterman.