Ruston, LA vs Scott, LA

Ruston, LA and Scott, LA have a very similar cost of living, with only a 1.5% difference in their overall index. Ruston scores 73 while Scott scores 74 on the cost of living index, where 100 represents the national average. The day-to-day expenses for residents in both cities are comparable, though differences emerge when looking at specific categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Ruston is $819/month compared to $1,002/month in Scott — a 18% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Ruston has cheaper rent, Scott actually has lower median home values ($155,700 vs $226,700).

Median household income in Ruston is $32,765 compared to $54,220 in Scott (-39.6%). While Scott is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Ruston spend roughly 30% of their income on rent, more than the 22.2% in Scott.

Climate-wise, Scott is notably warmer with an average of 69.4°F compared to 65.7°F in Ruston. Scott receives more rainfall at 62.8" per year compared to 55.1" in Ruston.