Rockford, OH vs Sugarcreek, OH

Rockford is moderately more affordable than Sugarcreek, with a 11.5% lower cost of living index. Rockford scores 66 compared to 75 for Sugarcreek, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Sugarcreek can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Rockford is $806/month compared to $822/month in Sugarcreek — a 2% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Rockford is more affordable at $120,400 median vs $220,000.

Median household income in Rockford is $56,625 compared to $75,750 in Sugarcreek (-25.2%). While Sugarcreek is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Rockford spend roughly 17.1% of their income on rent, more than the 13% in Sugarcreek.