Richlands, NC vs Selma, NC

Selma is moderately more affordable than Richlands, with a 7.6% lower cost of living index. Richlands scores 78 compared to 73 for Selma, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Richlands can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Richlands is $929/month compared to $824/month in Selma — a 13% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Selma is more affordable at $161,100 median vs $217,800.

Median household income in Richlands is $61,607 compared to $37,440 in Selma (+64.5%). While Richlands is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Richlands spend roughly 18.1% of their income on rent, less than the 26.4% in Selma.