Reno, OH vs Sugar Grove, OH

Reno is moderately more affordable than Sugar Grove, with a 10.2% lower cost of living index. Reno scores 72 compared to 80 for Sugar Grove, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Sugar Grove can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Reno is $797/month compared to $1,078/month in Sugar Grove — a 26% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Reno has cheaper rent, Sugar Grove actually has lower median home values ($171,300 vs $188,100).

Median household income in Reno is $40,954 compared to $68,000 in Sugar Grove (-39.8%). While Sugar Grove is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Reno spend roughly 23.4% of their income on rent, more than the 19% in Sugar Grove.