Redlands, CA vs Selma, CA
The cost of living difference between Redlands, CA and Selma, CA is dramatic. Selma is 47.6% cheaper than Redlands, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Redlands has a cost index of 142 while Selma sits at 97, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.
On the housing front, median rent in Redlands is $1,883/month compared to $1,202/month in Selma — a 57% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Selma is more affordable at $288,700 median vs $583,000.
Median household income in Redlands is $99,158 compared to $55,839 in Selma (+77.6%). While Redlands is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Redlands spend roughly 22.8% of their income on rent, less than the 25.8% in Selma.
Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (63.3°F vs 65°F). Selma receives more rainfall at 11" per year compared to 10.7" in Redlands.
Income & Cost
Housing
Salary Equivalency Calculator
What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?
Everyday Prices
BLS Average Prices by metro area
Climate
NOAA 30-year normals (1991-2020)