Port Clinton, OH vs Portsmouth, OH

Portsmouth is moderately more affordable than Port Clinton, with a 10.6% lower cost of living index. Port Clinton scores 70 compared to 63 for Portsmouth, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Port Clinton can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Port Clinton is $882/month compared to $758/month in Portsmouth — a 16% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Portsmouth is more affordable at $95,000 median vs $142,100.

Median household income in Port Clinton is $58,524 compared to $35,319 in Portsmouth (+65.7%). While Port Clinton is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Port Clinton spend roughly 18.1% of their income on rent, less than the 25.8% in Portsmouth.