Pittsfield, IL vs Wyoming, IL

Wyoming is moderately more affordable than Pittsfield, with a 6% lower cost of living index. Pittsfield scores 64 compared to 61 for Wyoming, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Pittsfield can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Pittsfield is $703/month compared to $686/month in Wyoming — a 3% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Wyoming is more affordable at $105,700 median vs $113,300.

Median household income in Pittsfield is $52,432 compared to $57,969 in Wyoming (-9.6%). Wyoming offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Pittsfield spend roughly 16.1% of their income on rent, more than the 14.2% in Wyoming.