Pasco, WA vs Pullman, WA

Pasco, WA and Pullman, WA have a very similar cost of living, with only a 1.7% difference in their overall index. Pasco scores 99 while Pullman scores 101 on the cost of living index, where 100 represents the national average. The day-to-day expenses for residents in both cities are comparable, though differences emerge when looking at specific categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Pasco is $1,201/month compared to $1,010/month in Pullman — a 19% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Pullman has cheaper rent, Pasco actually has lower median home values ($344,700 vs $401,700).

Median household income in Pasco is $81,130 compared to $45,097 in Pullman (+79.9%). Pasco offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Pasco spend roughly 17.8% of their income on rent, less than the 26.9% in Pullman.

Climate-wise, Pasco is notably warmer with an average of 53.3°F compared to 48.6°F in Pullman. Pullman receives more rainfall at 17.5" per year compared to 7.6" in Pasco.