Oakland, OR vs St. Paul, OR

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Oakland is 20.9% cheaper than St. Paul. With a cost index of 99 vs 125, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Oakland to St. Paul should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Oakland is $1,185/month compared to $1,518/month in St. Paul — a 22% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Oakland is more affordable at $318,400 median vs $523,900.

Median household income in Oakland is $58,272 compared to $113,000 in St. Paul (-48.4%). While St. Paul is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Oakland spend roughly 24.4% of their income on rent, more than the 16.1% in St. Paul.

Climate-wise, Oakland is notably warmer with an average of 55.9°F compared to 52.9°F in St. Paul. St. Paul receives more rainfall at 37.6" per year compared to 32.1" in Oakland.