Oakhurst, OK vs Sterling, OK

Sterling is moderately more affordable than Oakhurst, with a 9.4% lower cost of living index. Oakhurst scores 70 compared to 64 for Sterling, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Oakhurst can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Oakhurst is $879/month compared to $775/month in Sterling — a 13% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Sterling is more affordable at $120,800 median vs $147,700.

Median household income in Oakhurst is $61,500 compared to $65,521 in Sterling (-6.1%). Sterling offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Oakhurst spend roughly 17.2% of their income on rent, more than the 14.2% in Sterling.