Oakfield, WI vs Omro, WI

Omro is moderately more affordable than Oakfield, with a 9.2% lower cost of living index. Oakfield scores 79 compared to 72 for Omro, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Oakfield can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Oakfield is $916/month compared to $882/month in Omro — a 4% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Omro is more affordable at $170,300 median vs $229,700.

Median household income in Oakfield is $100,417 compared to $67,426 in Omro (+48.9%). While Oakfield is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Oakfield spend roughly 10.9% of their income on rent, less than the 15.7% in Omro.