Oakdale, CA vs Rolling Hills Estates, CA

The cost of living difference between Oakdale, CA and Rolling Hills Estates, CA is dramatic. Oakdale is 57.9% cheaper than Rolling Hills Estates, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Oakdale has a cost index of 117 while Rolling Hills Estates sits at 278, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.

On the housing front, median rent in Oakdale is $1,471/month compared to $3,501/month in Rolling Hills Estates — a 58% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Oakdale is more affordable at $432,800 median vs $1,602,300.

Median household income in Oakdale is $86,478 compared to $187,500 in Rolling Hills Estates (-53.9%). The higher salaries in Rolling Hills Estates partially offset the cost difference, but don't fully close the gap. Looking at affordability, residents of Oakdale spend roughly 20.4% of their income on rent, less than the 22.4% in Rolling Hills Estates.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (63.1°F vs 63°F). Rolling Hills Estates receives more rainfall at 13.6" per year compared to 12.3" in Oakdale.