New Washington, OH vs Sugarcreek, OH

New Washington is moderately more affordable than Sugarcreek, with a 8.5% lower cost of living index. New Washington scores 69 compared to 75 for Sugarcreek, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Sugarcreek can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in New Washington is $910/month compared to $822/month in Sugarcreek — a 11% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Sugarcreek has cheaper rent, New Washington actually has lower median home values ($110,000 vs $220,000).

Median household income in New Washington is $62,292 compared to $75,750 in Sugarcreek (-17.8%). While Sugarcreek is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of New Washington spend roughly 17.5% of their income on rent, more than the 13% in Sugarcreek.