Naperville, IL vs Orland Park, IL

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Orland Park is 24.6% cheaper than Naperville. With a cost index of 107 vs 134, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Orland Park to Naperville should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Naperville is $1,852/month compared to $1,415/month in Orland Park — a 31% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Orland Park is more affordable at $349,400 median vs $509,900.

Median household income in Naperville is $150,937 compared to $98,979 in Orland Park (+52.5%). While Naperville is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Naperville spend roughly 14.7% of their income on rent, less than the 17.2% in Orland Park.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (49.7°F vs 52.1°F). Orland Park receives more rainfall at 34.4" per year compared to 33.2" in Naperville.