Myrtle Point, OR vs Port Orford, OR

Myrtle Point is moderately more affordable than Port Orford, with a 9.2% lower cost of living index. Myrtle Point scores 78 compared to 86 for Port Orford, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Port Orford can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Myrtle Point is $710/month compared to $950/month in Port Orford — a 25% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Myrtle Point is more affordable at $239,700 median vs $247,500.

Median household income in Myrtle Point is $42,357 compared to $34,122 in Port Orford (+24.1%). Myrtle Point offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Myrtle Point spend roughly 20.1% of their income on rent, less than the 33.4% in Port Orford. The Myrtle Point ratio exceeds the commonly recommended 30% threshold, which can put pressure on household budgets.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (50.4°F vs 50.4°F). Port Orford receives more rainfall at 65.3" per year compared to 65.3" in Myrtle Point.