Mulvane, KS vs Sterling, KS

The cost of living difference between Mulvane, KS and Sterling, KS is dramatic. Sterling is 32.4% cheaper than Mulvane, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Mulvane has a cost index of 80 while Sterling sits at 61, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.

On the housing front, median rent in Mulvane is $1,156/month compared to $618/month in Sterling — a 87% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Sterling is more affordable at $130,200 median vs $168,900.

Median household income in Mulvane is $70,224 compared to $51,304 in Sterling (+36.9%). While Mulvane is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Mulvane spend roughly 19.8% of their income on rent, more than the 14.5% in Sterling.