Mount Sterling, KY vs Russell Springs, KY
Mount Sterling is moderately more affordable than Russell Springs, with a 6.7% lower cost of living index. Mount Sterling scores 64 compared to 69 for Russell Springs, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Russell Springs can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.
On the housing front, median rent in Mount Sterling is $564/month compared to $747/month in Russell Springs — a 25% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Mount Sterling has cheaper rent, Russell Springs actually has lower median home values ($170,300 vs $178,200).
Median household income in Mount Sterling is $50,843 compared to $37,500 in Russell Springs (+35.6%). Mount Sterling offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Mount Sterling spend roughly 13.3% of their income on rent, less than the 23.9% in Russell Springs.
Income & Cost
Housing
Salary Equivalency Calculator
What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?
Everyday Prices
BLS Average Prices by metro area