Home / Compare / Mineral vs Mountain Ranch

Mineral, CA vs Mountain Ranch, CA

95
Mineral
California
VS
-17.8%
116
Mountain Ranch
California

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Mineral is 17.8% cheaper than Mountain Ranch. With a cost index of 95 vs 116, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Mineral to Mountain Ranch should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

Median household income in Mineral is $85,455 compared to $160,837 in Mountain Ranch (-46.9%). While Mountain Ranch is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (63.4°F vs 63°F). Mineral receives more rainfall at 33.5" per year compared to 13.5" in Mountain Ranch.

Income & Cost

Cost of Living Index
Mineral
95
18% cheaper
Mountain Ranch
116
Median Household Income
Mineral
$85,455
Mountain Ranch
$160,837
47% higher

Housing

Median Rent
Mineral
$1,052
Mountain Ranch
Median Home Value
Mineral
Mountain Ranch
$457,900
Population
Mineral
107
Mountain Ranch
310

Salary Equivalency Calculator

What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?

$
Formula:

Climate

NOAA 30-year normals (1991-2020)

Avg Temp
Mineral 63.4°F
Mountain Ranch 63°F
Summer High
Mineral 100°F
Mountain Ranch 95°F
Winter Low
Mineral 38°F
Mountain Ranch 39°F
Rainfall
Mineral 33.5"
Mountain Ranch 13.5"
Rainy Days
Mineral 81d
Mountain Ranch 57d