Miller, SD vs Philip, SD

Miller is moderately more affordable than Philip, with a 5.1% lower cost of living index. Miller scores 59 compared to 62 for Philip, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Philip can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Miller is $546/month compared to $739/month in Philip — a 26% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Miller has cheaper rent, Philip actually has lower median home values ($102,800 vs $135,100).

Median household income in Miller is $51,774 compared to $43,750 in Philip (+18.3%). Miller offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Miller spend roughly 12.7% of their income on rent, less than the 20.3% in Philip.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (45.9°F vs 47.6°F). Miller receives more rainfall at 23.3" per year compared to 16.3" in Philip.