McLeansboro, IL vs Oakland, IL

McLeansboro, IL and Oakland, IL have a very similar cost of living, with only a 1.5% difference in their overall index. McLeansboro scores 56 while Oakland scores 57 on the cost of living index, where 100 represents the national average. The day-to-day expenses for residents in both cities are comparable, though differences emerge when looking at specific categories.

On the housing front, median rent in McLeansboro is $548/month compared to $509/month in Oakland — a 8% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Oakland has cheaper rent, McLeansboro actually has lower median home values ($72,200 vs $97,200).

Median household income in McLeansboro is $46,589 compared to $49,571 in Oakland (-6%). While Oakland is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of McLeansboro spend roughly 14.1% of their income on rent, more than the 12.3% in Oakland.

Climate-wise, McLeansboro is notably warmer with an average of 56.4°F compared to 53.4°F in Oakland. McLeansboro receives more rainfall at 44" per year compared to 36" in Oakland.