Marshfield, MA vs Rutland, MA

The cost of living difference between Marshfield, MA and Rutland, MA is dramatic. Rutland is 34.4% cheaper than Marshfield, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Marshfield has a cost index of 134 while Rutland sits at 100, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.

On the housing front, median rent in Marshfield is $1,398/month compared to $1,134/month in Rutland — a 23% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Rutland is more affordable at $357,700 median vs $646,400.

Median household income in Marshfield is $99,537 compared to $102,885 in Rutland (-3.3%). Rutland offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Marshfield spend roughly 16.9% of their income on rent, more than the 13.2% in Rutland.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (50°F vs 48.1°F). Rutland receives more rainfall at 48.3" per year compared to 48" in Marshfield.