Malta, IL vs Pittsfield, IL

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Pittsfield is 27.6% cheaper than Malta. With a cost index of 64 vs 82, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Pittsfield to Malta should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Malta is $1,036/month compared to $703/month in Pittsfield — a 47% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Pittsfield is more affordable at $113,300 median vs $178,900.

Median household income in Malta is $83,611 compared to $52,432 in Pittsfield (+59.5%). While Malta is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Malta spend roughly 14.9% of their income on rent, less than the 16.1% in Pittsfield.

Climate-wise, Pittsfield is notably warmer with an average of 53°F compared to 47.8°F in Malta. Malta receives more rainfall at 37.4" per year compared to 36.4" in Pittsfield.