Home / Compare / Lusk vs Wheatland

Lusk, WY vs Wheatland, WY

64
Lusk
Wyoming
VS
-12.9%
73
Wheatland
Wyoming

Lusk is moderately more affordable than Wheatland, with a 12.9% lower cost of living index. Lusk scores 64 compared to 73 for Wheatland, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Wheatland can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Lusk is $590/month compared to $707/month in Wheatland — a 17% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Lusk is more affordable at $164,200 median vs $236,400.

Median household income in Lusk is $44,755 compared to $55,908 in Wheatland (-19.9%). While Wheatland is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Lusk spend roughly 15.8% of their income on rent, more than the 15.2% in Wheatland.

Income & Cost

Cost of Living Index
Lusk
64
13% cheaper
Wheatland
73
Median Household Income
Lusk
$44,755
Wheatland
$55,908
20% higher

Housing

Median Rent
Lusk
$590
17% cheaper
Wheatland
$707
Median Home Value
Lusk
$164,200
31% cheaper
Wheatland
$236,400
Population
Lusk
1,482
Wheatland
3,570

Salary Equivalency Calculator

What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?

$
Formula: