Lucasville, OH vs Port Washington, OH

Port Washington is moderately more affordable than Lucasville, with a 7.7% lower cost of living index. Lucasville scores 72 compared to 67 for Port Washington, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Lucasville can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Lucasville is $821/month compared to $846/month in Port Washington — a 3% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Lucasville has cheaper rent, Port Washington actually has lower median home values ($115,000 vs $187,400).

Median household income in Lucasville is $70,489 compared to $60,625 in Port Washington (+16.3%). While Lucasville is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Lucasville spend roughly 14% of their income on rent, less than the 16.7% in Port Washington.