Long Lake, MN vs Redwood Falls, MN

The cost of living difference between Long Lake, MN and Redwood Falls, MN is dramatic. Redwood Falls is 63.5% cheaper than Long Lake, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Long Lake has a cost index of 118 while Redwood Falls sits at 72, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.

On the housing front, median rent in Long Lake is $1,613/month compared to $824/month in Redwood Falls — a 96% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Redwood Falls is more affordable at $162,000 median vs $391,400.

Median household income in Long Lake is $95,972 compared to $61,947 in Redwood Falls (+54.9%). The higher salaries in Long Lake partially offset the cost difference, but don't fully close the gap. Looking at affordability, residents of Long Lake spend roughly 20.2% of their income on rent, more than the 16% in Redwood Falls.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (46.7°F vs 45.4°F). Long Lake receives more rainfall at 30.6" per year compared to 28" in Redwood Falls.