Loch Lomond, VA vs Sugarland Run, VA

Loch Lomond is moderately more affordable than Sugarland Run, with a 9.6% lower cost of living index. Loch Lomond scores 140 compared to 155 for Sugarland Run, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Sugarland Run can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Loch Lomond is $2,234/month compared to $2,345/month in Sugarland Run — a 5% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Loch Lomond is more affordable at $412,900 median vs $552,700.

Median household income in Loch Lomond is $109,873 compared to $158,977 in Sugarland Run (-30.9%). While Sugarland Run is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Loch Lomond spend roughly 24.4% of their income on rent, more than the 17.7% in Sugarland Run.