Littleton Common, MA vs Woods Hole, MA
Littleton Common is moderately more affordable than Woods Hole, with a 8.6% lower cost of living index. Littleton Common scores 133 compared to 145 for Woods Hole, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Woods Hole can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.
On the housing front, median rent in Littleton Common is $1,604/month compared to $1,180/month in Woods Hole — a 36% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Woods Hole has cheaper rent, Littleton Common actually has lower median home values ($551,800 vs $876,700).
Median household income in Littleton Common is $129,347 compared to $72,386 in Woods Hole (+78.7%). Littleton Common offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Littleton Common spend roughly 14.9% of their income on rent, less than the 19.6% in Woods Hole.
Income & Cost
Housing
Salary Equivalency Calculator
What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?
Everyday Prices
BLS Average Prices by metro area