Litchfield, MN vs Wells, MN

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Wells is 22.5% cheaper than Litchfield. With a cost index of 62 vs 77, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Wells to Litchfield should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Litchfield is $917/month compared to $699/month in Wells — a 31% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Wells is more affordable at $93,200 median vs $183,900.

Median household income in Litchfield is $57,539 compared to $58,663 in Wells (-1.9%). Wells offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Litchfield spend roughly 19.1% of their income on rent, more than the 14.3% in Wells.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (42.9°F vs 45.6°F). Wells receives more rainfall at 36.3" per year compared to 28.5" in Litchfield.