Lincoln, NH vs Pittsfield, NH

Lincoln, NH and Pittsfield, NH have a very similar cost of living, with only a 1% difference in their overall index. Lincoln scores 92 while Pittsfield scores 93 on the cost of living index, where 100 represents the national average. The day-to-day expenses for residents in both cities are comparable, though differences emerge when looking at specific categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Lincoln is $1,025/month compared to $1,167/month in Pittsfield — a 12% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Lincoln has cheaper rent, Pittsfield actually has lower median home values ($242,600 vs $283,500).

Median household income in Lincoln is $56,406 compared to $50,804 in Pittsfield (+11%). Lincoln offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Lincoln spend roughly 21.8% of their income on rent, less than the 27.6% in Pittsfield.

Climate-wise, Pittsfield is notably warmer with an average of 47.2°F compared to 42.6°F in Lincoln. Pittsfield receives more rainfall at 42" per year compared to 37" in Lincoln.