Lincoln, CA vs Pasadena, CA

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Lincoln is 20.9% cheaper than Pasadena. With a cost index of 153 vs 193, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Lincoln to Pasadena should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Lincoln is $2,081/month compared to $2,218/month in Pasadena — a 6% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Lincoln is more affordable at $628,500 median vs $1,045,000.

Median household income in Lincoln is $108,108 compared to $103,778 in Pasadena (+4.2%). Lincoln offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Lincoln spend roughly 23.1% of their income on rent, less than the 25.6% in Pasadena.

Climate-wise, Pasadena is notably warmer with an average of 65.8°F compared to 61.2°F in Lincoln. Lincoln receives more rainfall at 18" per year compared to 14.3" in Pasadena.