Las Vegas, NV vs Elma, WA

Elma is moderately more affordable than Las Vegas, with a 12.6% lower cost of living index. Las Vegas scores 111 compared to 99 for Elma, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Las Vegas can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Las Vegas is $1,456/month compared to $987/month in Elma — a 48% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Elma is more affordable at $379,200 median vs $395,300.

Median household income in Las Vegas is $70,723 compared to $66,194 in Elma (+6.8%). The higher salaries in Las Vegas partially offset the cost difference, but don't fully close the gap. Looking at affordability, residents of Las Vegas spend roughly 24.7% of their income on rent, more than the 17.9% in Elma.

Climate-wise, Las Vegas is notably warmer with an average of 68.8°F compared to 51.4°F in Elma. Elma receives more rainfall at 67.9" per year compared to 4" in Las Vegas.