Laona, WI vs Randolph, WI

Laona is moderately more affordable than Randolph, with a 5.2% lower cost of living index. Laona scores 64 compared to 67 for Randolph, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Randolph can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Laona is $660/month compared to $689/month in Randolph — a 4% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Laona is more affordable at $131,900 median vs $155,900.

Median household income in Laona is $39,688 compared to $60,813 in Randolph (-34.7%). While Randolph is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Laona spend roughly 20% of their income on rent, more than the 13.6% in Randolph.