Lansdowne, PA vs Oak Lane, PA

Lansdowne is moderately more affordable than Oak Lane, with a 7.5% lower cost of living index. Lansdowne scores 89 compared to 96 for Oak Lane, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Oak Lane can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Lansdowne is $1,219/month compared to $1,178/month in Oak Lane — a 4% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Oak Lane has cheaper rent, Lansdowne actually has lower median home values ($199,200 vs $332,400).

Median household income in Lansdowne is $69,261 compared to $130,469 in Oak Lane (-46.9%). While Oak Lane is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Lansdowne spend roughly 21.1% of their income on rent, more than the 10.8% in Oak Lane.