Kingsville, MO vs Lilbourn, MO

Lilbourn is moderately more affordable than Kingsville, with a 14.8% lower cost of living index. Kingsville scores 67 compared to 58 for Lilbourn, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Kingsville can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Kingsville is $868/month compared to $692/month in Lilbourn — a 25% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Lilbourn is more affordable at $65,600 median vs $98,400.

Median household income in Kingsville is $64,250 compared to $41,250 in Lilbourn (+55.8%). While Kingsville is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Kingsville spend roughly 16.2% of their income on rent, less than the 20.1% in Lilbourn.