Kingfisher, OK vs Oakhurst, OK

Oakhurst is moderately more affordable than Kingfisher, with a 10.5% lower cost of living index. Kingfisher scores 78 compared to 70 for Oakhurst, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Kingfisher can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Kingfisher is $932/month compared to $879/month in Oakhurst — a 6% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Oakhurst is more affordable at $147,700 median vs $219,400.

Median household income in Kingfisher is $66,000 compared to $61,500 in Oakhurst (+7.3%). The higher salaries in Kingfisher partially offset the cost difference, but don't fully close the gap. Looking at affordability, residents of Kingfisher spend roughly 16.9% of their income on rent, less than the 17.2% in Oakhurst.