Kimberling City, MO vs Marshfield, MO

Marshfield is moderately more affordable than Kimberling City, with a 10.5% lower cost of living index. Kimberling City scores 79 compared to 71 for Marshfield, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Kimberling City can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Kimberling City is $925/month compared to $776/month in Marshfield — a 19% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Marshfield is more affordable at $201,300 median vs $237,700.

Median household income in Kimberling City is $48,274 compared to $67,134 in Marshfield (-28.1%). Marshfield offers a double advantage: higher earnings combined with a lower cost of living, giving residents significantly more purchasing power. Looking at affordability, residents of Kimberling City spend roughly 23% of their income on rent, more than the 13.9% in Marshfield.