Kimball, MN vs Utica, MN
Kimball is moderately more affordable than Utica, with a 11.7% lower cost of living index. Kimball scores 71 compared to 80 for Utica, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Utica can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.
On the housing front, median rent in Kimball is $743/month compared to $1,075/month in Utica — a 31% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Kimball has cheaper rent, Utica actually has lower median home values ($184,200 vs $208,200).
Median household income in Kimball is $69,271 compared to $86,250 in Utica (-19.7%). While Utica is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Kimball spend roughly 12.9% of their income on rent, less than the 15% in Utica.
Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (42.9°F vs 44.8°F). Utica receives more rainfall at 34.7" per year compared to 28.5" in Kimball.
Income & Cost
Housing
Salary Equivalency Calculator
What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?
Everyday Prices
BLS Average Prices by metro area
Climate
NOAA 30-year normals (1991-2020)