Kamas, UT vs Randolph, UT

The cost of living difference between Kamas, UT and Randolph, UT is dramatic. Randolph is 61.6% cheaper than Kamas, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Kamas has a cost index of 111 while Randolph sits at 69, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.

On the housing front, median rent in Kamas is $1,315/month compared to $625/month in Randolph — a 110% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Randolph is more affordable at $195,800 median vs $455,900.

Median household income in Kamas is $87,353 compared to $87,083 in Randolph (+0.3%). Kamas does offer higher incomes, but the salary premium barely offsets the higher cost of living, leaving residents with a tighter budget. Looking at affordability, residents of Kamas spend roughly 18.1% of their income on rent, more than the 8.6% in Randolph.