Issaquah, WA vs Lake Stickney, WA
The cost of living difference between Issaquah, WA and Lake Stickney, WA is dramatic. Lake Stickney is 35.7% cheaper than Issaquah, a gap that translates to thousands of dollars per year in household expenses. Issaquah has a cost index of 191 while Lake Stickney sits at 141, making this one of the more striking comparisons on our site. Relocating between these cities would require a serious reassessment of budget and lifestyle expectations.
On the housing front, median rent in Issaquah is $2,484/month compared to $1,733/month in Lake Stickney — a 43% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Lake Stickney is more affordable at $598,400 median vs $934,100.
Median household income in Issaquah is $153,786 compared to $85,762 in Lake Stickney (+79.3%). While Issaquah is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Issaquah spend roughly 19.4% of their income on rent, less than the 24.2% in Lake Stickney.
Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (53.6°F vs 51.4°F). Issaquah receives more rainfall at 34.7" per year compared to 33.4" in Lake Stickney.
Income & Cost
Housing
Salary Equivalency Calculator
What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?
Everyday Prices
BLS Average Prices by metro area
Climate
NOAA 30-year normals (1991-2020)