Irving, TX vs Sugar Land, TX

There is a significant gap in the cost of living between these two cities. Irving is 17% cheaper than Sugar Land. With a cost index of 105 vs 127, the difference would have a meaningful impact on a household's monthly budget. Someone relocating from Irving to Sugar Land should plan for substantially higher expenses across most categories.

On the housing front, median rent in Irving is $1,517/month compared to $1,939/month in Sugar Land — a 22% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Irving is more affordable at $287,300 median vs $406,600.

Median household income in Irving is $79,641 compared to $137,511 in Sugar Land (-42.1%). While Sugar Land is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Irving spend roughly 22.9% of their income on rent, more than the 16.9% in Sugar Land.

Climate-wise, Sugar Land is notably warmer with an average of 71.1°F compared to 66.6°F in Irving. Sugar Land receives more rainfall at 49.7" per year compared to 37" in Irving.