Ironton, MO vs Kelso, MO

Ironton is moderately more affordable than Kelso, with a 13.7% lower cost of living index. Ironton scores 62 compared to 72 for Kelso, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Kelso can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Ironton is $703/month compared to $810/month in Kelso — a 13% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Ironton is more affordable at $109,900 median vs $213,800.

Median household income in Ironton is $42,415 compared to $54,853 in Kelso (-22.7%). While Kelso is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Ironton spend roughly 19.9% of their income on rent, more than the 17.7% in Kelso.