Hyde Park, UT vs Woods Cross, UT

Hyde Park is moderately more affordable than Woods Cross, with a 6% lower cost of living index. Hyde Park scores 113 compared to 120 for Woods Cross, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Woods Cross can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Hyde Park is $1,269/month compared to $1,572/month in Woods Cross — a 19% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Hyde Park has cheaper rent, Woods Cross actually has lower median home values ($472,600 vs $507,400).

Median household income in Hyde Park is $108,068 compared to $115,335 in Woods Cross (-6.3%). While Woods Cross is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Hyde Park spend roughly 14.1% of their income on rent, less than the 16.4% in Woods Cross.