Hull, MA vs Ipswich, MA

Ipswich is moderately more affordable than Hull, with a 12.3% lower cost of living index. Hull scores 146 compared to 130 for Ipswich, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Hull can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Hull is $1,885/month compared to $1,456/month in Ipswich — a 30% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Ipswich is more affordable at $570,500 median vs $606,100.

Median household income in Hull is $127,112 compared to $92,969 in Ipswich (+36.7%). While Hull is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Hull spend roughly 17.8% of their income on rent, less than the 18.8% in Ipswich.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (51.9°F vs 49.9°F). Ipswich receives more rainfall at 44.9" per year compared to 43.6" in Hull.