Hugo, OK vs Kingston, OK

Hugo is moderately more affordable than Kingston, with a 12.4% lower cost of living index. Hugo scores 58 compared to 67 for Kingston, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Kingston can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Hugo is $634/month compared to $851/month in Kingston — a 26% difference. Home values follow the same pattern: Hugo is more affordable at $96,100 median vs $117,100.

Median household income in Hugo is $31,694 compared to $49,010 in Kingston (-35.3%). While Kingston is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Hugo spend roughly 24% of their income on rent, more than the 20.8% in Kingston.