Home / Compare / Hospers vs Liscomb

Hospers, IA vs Liscomb, IA

66
Hospers
Iowa
VS
-6%
71
Liscomb
Iowa

Hospers is moderately more affordable than Liscomb, with a 6% lower cost of living index. Hospers scores 66 compared to 71 for Liscomb, where the US average is 100. This difference means residents of Liscomb can expect to pay noticeably more for everyday expenses, housing, and services.

On the housing front, median rent in Hospers is $698/month compared to $1,025/month in Liscomb — a 32% difference. Interestingly, home values tell a different story: while Hospers has cheaper rent, Liscomb actually has lower median home values ($94,800 vs $163,700).

Median household income in Hospers is $73,819 compared to $81,336 in Liscomb (-9.2%). While Liscomb is more expensive, its higher salaries more than compensate — residents there may actually end up with more disposable income. Looking at affordability, residents of Hospers spend roughly 11.3% of their income on rent, less than the 15.1% in Liscomb.

Climate-wise, both cities share similar average temperatures (46.8°F vs 47.7°F). Liscomb receives more rainfall at 32.8" per year compared to 26.8" in Hospers.

Income & Cost

Cost of Living Index
Hospers
66
6% cheaper
Liscomb
71
Median Household Income
Hospers
$73,819
Liscomb
$81,336
9% higher

Housing

Median Rent
Hospers
$698
32% cheaper
Liscomb
$1,025
Median Home Value
Hospers
$163,700
Liscomb
$94,800
42% cheaper
Population
Hospers
945
Liscomb
323

Salary Equivalency Calculator

What does your salary in one city buy you in the other?

$
Formula:

Climate

NOAA 30-year normals (1991-2020)

Avg Temp
Hospers 46.8°F
Liscomb 47.7°F
Summer High
Hospers 85°F
Liscomb 83°F
Winter Low
Hospers 8°F
Liscomb 10°F
Rainfall
Hospers 26.8"
Liscomb 32.8"
Rainy Days
Hospers 97d
Liscomb 110d